
long story and narrated it subsequently. All this material was obtained in four language varieties: Brazilian and European Portuguese, standard French and German. The corpus is balanced for gender. Eight melodic and intensity parameters were automatically obtained from excerpts of 10 to 20 seconds. We showed that 6 out of 8 parameters partially distinguish professional from non-professional style in the four language varieties. Classification and discrimination tests carried out with 12 Brazilian listeners using delexicalised speech showed that these subjects are able to distinguish professional style from non-professional style with about 2/3 of hits irrespective of language. In comparison, an automatic classification using an LDA model performed better in classifying non-professional (96 %) against professional styles, but not in classifying professional (42 %) against non-professional styles.
[INFO.INFO-CL] Computer Science [cs]/Computation and Language [cs.CL], [INFO] Computer Science [cs], linguistique
[INFO.INFO-CL] Computer Science [cs]/Computation and Language [cs.CL], [INFO] Computer Science [cs], linguistique
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
