
doi: 10.1111/nph.13406
pmid: 25856385
Summary Contrasting fire regimes maintain patch mosaics of savanna, thicket and forest biomes in many African subtropical landscapes. Species dominating each biome are thus expected to display distinct fire‐related traits, commonly thought to be bark related. Recent Australian savanna research suggests that bud position, not bark protection alone, determines fire resilience via resprouting. We tested first how bud position influences resprouting ability in 17 tree species. We then compared the effect of both bark‐related protection and bud position on the distribution of 63 tree species in 253 transects in all three biomes. Tree species with buds positioned deep under bark had a higher proportion of post‐fire aboveground shoot resprouting. Species with low bud protection occurred in fire‐prone biomes only if they could root‐sucker. The effect of bud protection was supported by a good relationship between species bud protection and distribution across a gradient of fire frequency. Bud protection and high bark production are required to survive frequent fires in savanna. Forests are fire refugia hosting species with little or no bud protection and thin bark. Root‐suckering species occur in the three biomes, suggesting that fire is not the only factor filtering this functional type.
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, Geography, Flowers, Forests, Grassland, Fires, Trees, South Africa, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Species Specificity, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, Plant Bark
[SDE] Environmental Sciences, Geography, Flowers, Forests, Grassland, Fires, Trees, South Africa, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Species Specificity, [SDE]Environmental Sciences, Plant Bark
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 107 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
