Comment on “Correspondence Analysis used Complementary to Loglinear Analysis”

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Jun 1988 Netherlands English Publisher:Cambridge University Press (CUP)Journal:Psychometrika, volume 53, pages 287-291 (issn: 0033-3123, eissn: 1860-0980,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Van der Heijden, P.G.M.; Worsley, K.J.;

doi: 10.1007/bf02294139

Comment on “Correspondence Analysis used Complementary to Loglinear Analysis”

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

In van der Heijden and de Leeuw (1985) it was proposed to use loglinear analysis to detect interactions in a multiway contingency table, and to explore the form of these interactions with correspondence analysis. After performing the exploratory phase of the analysis, we will show here how the results found in this phase can be used for confirmation.

Country

Netherlands

Related Organizations

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	7
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average