
pmid: 27749207
Background/Study Context: The objective of this study was to investigate the object recognition deficit in aging. Age-related declines were examined from the presemantic account of category effects (PACE) theory perspective (Gerlach, 2009, Cognition, 111, 281-301). This view assumes that the structural similarity/dissimilarity inherent in living and nonliving objects, respectively, can account for a wide range of category-specific effects.In two experiments on object recognition, young (36 participants, 18-27 years) and older (36 participants, 53-69 years) adult participants' performances were compared.The young adults' results corroborate the PACE theory expectations. The results of the older adults showed an impairment in recognition of structurally similar objects irrespective of semantic category.The two sets of results suggest that a deficit in the selection stage of the PACE theory (visual long-term memory matching) could be responsible for these impairments. Indeed, the older group showed a deficit when this stage was most relevant. This article emphasize on the critical need for taking into account structural component of the stimuli and type of tasks in further studies.
Adult, Male, Aging, Adolescent, Age Factors, Visual/physiology, Recognition, Psychology/physiology, Recognition, Psychology, [SCCO] Cognitive science, Pattern Recognition, Middle Aged, Aging/physiology, Psychology/physiology, Recognition, Young Adult, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Humans, Female, Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology
Adult, Male, Aging, Adolescent, Age Factors, Visual/physiology, Recognition, Psychology/physiology, Recognition, Psychology, [SCCO] Cognitive science, Pattern Recognition, Middle Aged, Aging/physiology, Psychology/physiology, Recognition, Young Adult, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Humans, Female, Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
