Downloads provided by UsageCounts
#OERxDomains21 pre-conference workshop 19 April 2021 Session abstract This workshop will engage participants in a discussion of the apparent “understanding gap” between the two OEPs of open educational practices and open education policies, with the aim of ensuring the recognition of existing, successful open practices within appropriate open policies. The starting point of the workshop is the recognition of the distance between much open education policy discourse (often focused on OER, as shown for example by the UNESCO 2019 Recommendation on OER), the research communities working to categorise, replicate and promote a range of grassroots open educational practices (OEP), and the rich variety of actual practices undertaken by educators. OEP, which were initially understood as teaching approaches that are closely connected to the creation and use of OER (Ehlers 2011), are increasingly being defined more widely, taking in aspects other than open content such as inclusive pedagogies (Havemann 2020), sharing-based approaches (Cronin 2017), care-based teaching methods (Bali, Cronin and Jhangiani 2019) and accessibility dynamics (Tlili et al 2020). In order to explore the different way of understanding openness of the Open Education policy community and the OEP research community, the workshop will engage participants in discussing definitions and perspectives and in co-designing a “policy-sensitive” and “policy-relevant” way to look at OEP, which means classifying OEP from a policy point of view. Furthermore, we will look at key strategies to support the adoption of the principles of OEP within wider policy and strategic environments in the HE sector, such as digital education, e-learning and open access policies, to ensure that open practices are embedded, supported, enabled and rewarded in line with the academic development programmes, career progression criteria and innovation and teaching excellence schemes. We will invite participants to co-create an action plan and a roadmap following the OE policy co-creation recommendations outlined by Atenas, Havemann, Neumann & Stefanelli (2020), using Mentimeter to crowdsource ideas that can be used to draft guidelines for the inclusion of OEP in HE at policy and strategic levels. References Atenas, J., Havemann, L., Neumann, J. and Stefanelli, C., 2020. Open Education Policies: Guidelines for co-creation. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4281363 Bali, M., Cronin, C. and Jhangiani, R.S., 2020. Framing Open Educational Practices from a Social Justice Perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1). http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.565 Cronin, C., 2017. Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL, 18(5), pp.15-34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096 Ehlers, U.D., 2011. Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 15(2), pp.1-10. http://www.uh.cu/static/documents/RDA/From%20Open%20Educational%20Resources.pdf Havemann, L., 2020. Open in the evening: openings and closures in an ecology of practices, in Open(ing) Education: Theory and Practice, eds D. Conrad & P. Prinsloo, Brill Sense, Leiden, Netherlands, pp. 329–344. http://oro.open.ac.uk/69167 Tlili, A., Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Zhang, X., Huang, R. and Chang, T.W., 2020. The evolution of sustainability models for Open Educational Resources: insights from the literature and experts. Interactive Learning Environments, pp.1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1839507 Conference session page: https://oer21.oerconf.org/a-tale-of-two-oeps-looking-at-open-educational-practices-from-a-policy-viewpoint/ Google slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1HLg1npK2LvM_rOaNul6rivYV4HeYqPKcxp04ijBPXM0/edit?usp=sharing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts