Downloads provided by UsageCounts
ABSTRACT: How can we think about a universal ethics that could be adopted by any intelligent being, including the rising population of cyborgs, intelligent machines, intelligent algorithms, or even, potentially, extraterrestrial life? We generally give value to complex structures, to objects resulting from long periods of work, and to systems with many elements and with many links finely adjusted. These include living beings, books, works of art, and scientific theories. Intuitively, we want to keep, multiply, and share such structures, as well as prevent their destruction. Such objects have value not because more information (in bits) would simply mean more value. Instead, they have value because they require a long computational history – assuming that the numerous interactions governing their construction constitute a computation – and they display what we call organized complexity. To propose the foundations of a universal ethics based on the intrinsic value of organized complexity, we first discuss conceptions of complexity, and argue that Charles Bennett’s logical depth is a satisfactory notion of what we are looking for. We then put forward three fundamental imperatives: to preserve, augment, and recursively promote organized complexity. We show a broad range of applications with human, non-human, and non-living examples. Finally, we discuss some specific issues of our framework such as the distribution of complexity, the managing of copies and erasures, and how our universal ethics tackles classical ethical issues. In sum, we propose a clear, homogenous, and consistent ethical foundation that can integrate many universal ethics desiderata. KEYWORDS: Philosophy of information, organized complexity, Kolmogorov complexity, logical depth, ethics, universal ethics, infoethics, thermoethics, environmental ethics, transhumanism
Final version, forthcoming in Evolution, Development and Complexity: Multiscale Evolutionary Models of Complex Adaptive Systems, edited by G. Georgiev, C. L. F. Martinez, M. E. Price, & J. M. Smart. Springer Publishing.
[INFO.INFO-AI] Computer Science [cs]/Artificial Intelligence [cs.AI], Organized complexity, philosophy of information, Universal ethics, Kolmogorov complexity, environmental ethics, [SHS.PHIL] Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy, Thermoethics, transhumanism, Transhumanism, Ethics, thermoethics, Environmental ethics, organized complexity, logical depth, Logical depth, Philosophy of information, [SDV.ETH] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ethics, infoethics, ethics, universal ethics, [INFO.INFO-CC] Computer Science [cs]/Computational Complexity [cs.CC], [INFO.INFO-MA] Computer Science [cs]/Multiagent Systems [cs.MA], [INFO.INFO-MO] Computer Science [cs]/Modeling and Simulation, Infoethics
[INFO.INFO-AI] Computer Science [cs]/Artificial Intelligence [cs.AI], Organized complexity, philosophy of information, Universal ethics, Kolmogorov complexity, environmental ethics, [SHS.PHIL] Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy, Thermoethics, transhumanism, Transhumanism, Ethics, thermoethics, Environmental ethics, organized complexity, logical depth, Logical depth, Philosophy of information, [SDV.ETH] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ethics, infoethics, ethics, universal ethics, [INFO.INFO-CC] Computer Science [cs]/Computational Complexity [cs.CC], [INFO.INFO-MA] Computer Science [cs]/Multiagent Systems [cs.MA], [INFO.INFO-MO] Computer Science [cs]/Modeling and Simulation, Infoethics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 30 | |
| downloads | 38 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts