Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.3390/app10114031
handle: 20.500.14279/19204
The past few years have seen an increase in the use of virtual reality (VR) in museum environments in an attempt for museums to embrace technological innovations and adapt to the challenges of the digital era. While there are studies that examine the advantages of VR in museums and visitors’ experiences with it, there are no studies examining the experiences of museum professionals who are responsible for a museum’s objects and narratives. The aim of this paper is to explore the practices, experiences, and perceptions of museum professionals on the use of VR technology in museums, their perceived advantages and challenges of such technologies, and their vision for the future of technology in museums. The paper provides an in-depth analysis of interviews with museum professionals from a number of countries around the world who worked with particular VR projects in their own institutions. The ultimate aim is to offer a more critical and holistic examination and assessment of the use of VR in museums and provide suggestions for designing and developing VR projects in the future.
Technology, QH301-705.5, QC1-999, challenges, museum professionals, suggestions, Virtual reality, Humanities, perceptions, Suggestions, VR uses, Perceptions, Challenges, Biology (General), QD1-999, Museums, T, Physics, advantages, Arts, cultural heritage, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Chemistry, Cultural heritage, Museum professionals, Advantages, virtual reality, TA1-2040, museums
Technology, QH301-705.5, QC1-999, challenges, museum professionals, suggestions, Virtual reality, Humanities, perceptions, Suggestions, VR uses, Perceptions, Challenges, Biology (General), QD1-999, Museums, T, Physics, advantages, Arts, cultural heritage, Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General), Chemistry, Cultural heritage, Museum professionals, Advantages, virtual reality, TA1-2040, museums
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 186 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
| views | 12 | |
| downloads | 14 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts