
doi: 10.22323/2.22030203
handle: 11568/1201149
In this article, the authors aim to reflect on the relationship between collaborative creation and creativity ('co-creativity') within Living Lab (LL) research and innovation in the domain of agri-food systems.While the value of LL is often perceived to be the collaboration among its participants, there is a need to capture and measure the process of co-creation.Co-creativity is indicated by the literature to be a necessary research and collaborative component of social change, as well as for promoting a transformative sustainability agenda.This article uses empirical and primary data collected in the context of the DIVINFOOD project to show the extent to which researchers actively promote, manage and respond to the effects of collaborative creativity within their research. Collaborative creativity is an indispensable component of the co-creation process because it supports collaborative learning. The authors conclude that measuring co-creativity could be an interesting indicator to monitor the development of LLs over time.
Citizen science; Environmental communication; Participation and science governance; Living Labs; Co-Creation; Creativity; Food Transformation; Design, [SHS.SOCIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, Design, [SHS.SOCIO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, Citizen science, 551, Living Labs, Food Transformation, Creativity, Co-Creation, Participation and science governance, Environmental communication
Citizen science; Environmental communication; Participation and science governance; Living Labs; Co-Creation; Creativity; Food Transformation; Design, [SHS.SOCIO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, Design, [SHS.SOCIO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Sociology, Citizen science, 551, Living Labs, Food Transformation, Creativity, Co-Creation, Participation and science governance, Environmental communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
