Downloads provided by UsageCounts
handle: 2078.1/248737 , 1942/36049
In Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) thin‐film solar cells, interface recombination is one of the most important limiting factors with respect to device performance. Herein, metal–insulator–semiconductor samples are used to investigate and compare the passivation effects of Al2O3 and HfO2 at the interface with CIGS. Capacitance–voltage–frequency measurements allow to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the existence of high negative charge density (Q f ≈ −1012 cm−2) and low interface‐trap density (D it ≈ 1011 cm−2 eV−1). At the rear interface of CIGS solar cells, these, respectively, induce field‐effect and chemical passivation. A trade‐off is highlighted between stronger field‐effect for HfO2 and lower interface‐trap density for Al2O3. This motivates the usage of Al2O3 to induce chemical passivation at the front interface of CIGS solar cells but raises the issue of its processing compatibility with the buffer layer. Therefore, an innovative Al2O3/HfO2 multistack design is proposed and investigated for the first time. Effective chemical passivation is similarly demonstrated for this novel design, suggesting potential decrease in recombination rate at the front interface in CIGS solar cells and increased efficiency. 300 °C annealing in N2 environment enable to enhance passivation effectiveness by reducing D it while surface cleaning may reveal useful for alternative CIGS processing methods.
HfO2; Multi-stack; Thin-film photovoltaics, multistacks, Al2O3, CIGS interface passivation, thin-film photovoltaics, HfO2, CIGS interface passivation; Al2O3
HfO2; Multi-stack; Thin-film photovoltaics, multistacks, Al2O3, CIGS interface passivation, thin-film photovoltaics, HfO2, CIGS interface passivation; Al2O3
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 59 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts