
handle: 10486/671415 , 10550/79731
This paper deals with scientific discourse as a rhetorical discourse from the point of view of the structure of the classical parts of oral discourse (and all kinds of discourse). The role of argumentation in discourse, with the perlocutionary goal of convincing the receiver, is studied as the foundation of the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse. A scientific treatise by Santiago Ramón y Cajal is analysed using the tools provided by rhetoric in order to prove the rhetorical nature of scientific discourse. The main contribution of this paper is to establish the crucial role of argumentation in scientific discourse and to demonstrate its permeation of the entire discourse.
ZA3040-5185, Discurso retórico, Communication. Mass media, P87-96, Argumentación, Filosofía, Retórica. Retoricidad. Discurso retórico. Discurso científico. Argumentación., Discurso científico, Retórica, Information resources (General), Filología
ZA3040-5185, Discurso retórico, Communication. Mass media, P87-96, Argumentación, Filosofía, Retórica. Retoricidad. Discurso retórico. Discurso científico. Argumentación., Discurso científico, Retórica, Information resources (General), Filología
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
