
arXiv: 1502.00201
Was the spread of agro-pastoralism from the Eurasian founder regions dominated by demic or by cultural diffusion? This study employs simulations that unfold a complex inter-regional and time varying pattern of demic and diffusive exchange processes during the Neolithisation, and thus supports from a modelling perspective the hypothesis that there is no simple or exclusive demic or cultural diffusion, but that in most regions of Eurasia a combination of demic and cultural processes were important.
cultural diffusion, Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE), modelling, demic diffusion, Archaeology, FOS: Biological sciences, Eurasia, Neolithic, Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution, CC1-960
cultural diffusion, Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE), modelling, demic diffusion, Archaeology, FOS: Biological sciences, Eurasia, Neolithic, Quantitative Biology - Populations and Evolution, CC1-960
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
