
doi: 10.2307/2533172
pmid: 8934601
The need to quantify agreement between two raters or two methods of measuring a response often arises in research. Kappa statistics (unweighted and weighted) are appropriate when the data are nominal or ordinal, whereas the concordance correlation coefficient is more appropriate when the data are measured on a continuous scale. We develop weighted product-moment and concordance correlation coefficients which are applicable for repeated measurements study designs. We consider two distinct situations in which the repeated measurements are paired or unpaired over time. We illustrate the methodology with examples comparing (1) two assays for measuring serum cholesterol, (2) two estimates of dietary intake, from a food frequency questionnaire and dietary recalls, and (3) two measurements of percentage body fat, from skinfold calipers and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.
growth curve model, Biometry, Measures of association (correlation, canonical correlation, etc.), Estimation in multivariate analysis, Diet Records, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Skinfold Thickness, Absorptiometry, Photon, Cholesterol, Adipose Tissue, Surveys and Questionnaires, bootstrapping, Humans, random effects, GMANOVA model, agreement, Blood Chemical Analysis
growth curve model, Biometry, Measures of association (correlation, canonical correlation, etc.), Estimation in multivariate analysis, Diet Records, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Skinfold Thickness, Absorptiometry, Photon, Cholesterol, Adipose Tissue, Surveys and Questionnaires, bootstrapping, Humans, random effects, GMANOVA model, agreement, Blood Chemical Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 67 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
