
doi: 10.2307/2532785
pmid: 7981397
In this paper a simple but very general method is given for estimating a population total with any sampling design when objects in sampled units are observed with imperfect detectability--a problem characteristic of many surveys of natural and human populations. In the most general case, the method consists of dividing the value of the variable of interest associated with each detected object by the detection probability for that object and then proceeding to use the estimation method that would ordinarily be used under the design if there were no detectability problems. Examples illustrating the method include simple random sampling, conventional unequal probability sampling, and adaptive cluster sampling.
Population Density, unequal probability sampling, Analysis of Variance, Biometry, Models, Statistical, adaptive cluster sampling, simple random sampling, Sampling Studies, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, catchability, population total, imperfect detectability, sightability, Sampling theory, sample surveys, Humans, Probability
Population Density, unequal probability sampling, Analysis of Variance, Biometry, Models, Statistical, adaptive cluster sampling, simple random sampling, Sampling Studies, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, catchability, population total, imperfect detectability, sightability, Sampling theory, sample surveys, Humans, Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
