
doi: 10.2307/2171925
handle: 11585/952921
Summary: Inequality measures are often used to summarize information about empirical income distributions. However the resulting picture of the distribution and of changes in the distribution can be severely distorted if the data are contaminated. The nature of this distortion will in general depend upon the underlying properties of the inequality measure. We investigate this issue theoretically using a technique based on the influence function, and illustrate the magnitude of the effect using a simulation. We consider both direct nonparametric estimation from the sample, and indirect estimation using a parametric model; in the latter case we demonstrate the application of a robust estimation procedure. We apply our results to two micro-data examples.
inequality; contaminated data; influence function; parametric estimation; income distribution, Influence function, contaminated data, influence function, income distribution, simulation, Parametric estimation, direct nonparametric estimation, Inequality, inequality measures, Income distribution, Statistical methods; economic indices and measures, Contaminated data, ddc: ddc:332/658, ddc: ddc:330
inequality; contaminated data; influence function; parametric estimation; income distribution, Influence function, contaminated data, influence function, income distribution, simulation, Parametric estimation, direct nonparametric estimation, Inequality, inequality measures, Income distribution, Statistical methods; economic indices and measures, Contaminated data, ddc: ddc:332/658, ddc: ddc:330
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 115 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
