
It is almost a commonplace nowadays to hear of the end of the humanities, and defens-es of the humanities against all kinds of attack abound. A diagnosis might be in place, as an aside, before we begin: though these arguments in defense of the humanities are at the moment in vogue, the position of the attackers is not a dialogical one. Indeed, the attack does not seem to be founded on argument, but rather, in many ways, on unshakeable force – the kind of force that is not able to respond to argument (or even willing to read defenses of the humanities). In short, though there appear to be numer-ous ways of defending and attempting to fortify the humanities through perfectly valid and sound argument, the onslaught against the humanities does not seem bound either to listen or to respond.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
