
handle: 10419/90089 , 11590/298467
AbstractThis paper examines the characteristics of the collaborations between inventors in the United Kingdom (UK) by looking at what types of proximities – geographic, organisational, cognitive, social, and cultural–ethnic – between inventors are prevalent in partnerships that ultimately lead to technological progress. Using a new panel of UK inventors this paper provides an analysis of associations between these ‘proximities’ and co-patenting. The results show that while collaboration within firms, research centres and universities remains crucial, external networks of inventors are key feature of innovation teams. The analysis shows that external networks are highly dependent on previous social connections, but are generally unconstrained by cultural or cognitive factors. Geographical proximity is also weakly linked with external networks. Our results suggest that innovation policies should, rather than focus on spatial clustering, facilitate the formation of open and diverse networks of inventors.
Strategy and Management, patents, knowledge spillovers, Management Science and Operations Research, R23, Innovation, patents, proximities, cities, regions, knowledge spillovers, collaboration, ethnicity, Management of Technology and Innovation, cities, Ethnicity, regions, Innovation, Proximities, Patents, Engineering(all), O31, Knowledge spillovers, O33, ddc:330, innovation, patents, proximities, regions, knowledge spillovers, collaboration, ethnicity, proximities, collaboration, innovation, patents, proximities, cities, regions, knowledge spillovers, ethnicity, Collaboration; Ethnicity; Innovation; Knowledge spillovers; Patents; Proximities; Regions, R11, Collaboration, innovation; patents; proximities; cities; regions; knowledge spillovers; collaboration; ethnicity, JEL classification O31; O33; R11; R23; Engineering (all); Management of Technology and Innovation; Strategy and Management1409 Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management; Management Science and Operations Research, innovation, collaboration, Regions, ethnicity, jel: jel:R23, jel: jel:O31, jel: jel:O33, jel: jel:R11
Strategy and Management, patents, knowledge spillovers, Management Science and Operations Research, R23, Innovation, patents, proximities, cities, regions, knowledge spillovers, collaboration, ethnicity, Management of Technology and Innovation, cities, Ethnicity, regions, Innovation, Proximities, Patents, Engineering(all), O31, Knowledge spillovers, O33, ddc:330, innovation, patents, proximities, regions, knowledge spillovers, collaboration, ethnicity, proximities, collaboration, innovation, patents, proximities, cities, regions, knowledge spillovers, ethnicity, Collaboration; Ethnicity; Innovation; Knowledge spillovers; Patents; Proximities; Regions, R11, Collaboration, innovation; patents; proximities; cities; regions; knowledge spillovers; collaboration; ethnicity, JEL classification O31; O33; R11; R23; Engineering (all); Management of Technology and Innovation; Strategy and Management1409 Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management; Management Science and Operations Research, innovation, collaboration, Regions, ethnicity, jel: jel:R23, jel: jel:O31, jel: jel:O33, jel: jel:R11
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 245 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
