Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 13 Nov 2018 Brazil, Italy, Argentina, Spain, Czech Republic, Austria, South Africa, United States, United Kingdom English Publisher:Public Library of Science (PLoS)Journal:PLOS Biology, volume 16, page e2006686 (eissn: 1545-7885,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Aníbal Pauchard; Laura A. Meyerson; Sven Bacher; Tim M. Blackburn; Giuseppe Brundu; Marc W. Cadotte; Franck Courchamp; +19 Authors

doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686

pmid: 30422976

pmc: PMC6233909

handle: 10261/172678 , 11388/218697 , 11336/93421 , 11104/0295807 , 10019.1/106736

Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

Peer reviewed

Countries

Brazil, Italy, Argentina, Spain, Czech Republic, Austria, South Africa, United States, United Kingdom

Related Organizations

Leibniz Association
Germany
French National Centre for Scientific Research
France
Charles University
Czech Republic
University of Paris-Saclay
France
Université Paris-Saclay
France

View all View all

Keywords

570, Biodiversity accounting, QH301-705.5, DIVERSITY, alien species, ddc:333.7-333.9, Conservation, 333, Ecosystems, Formal Comment, Species extinction, BIODIVERSITY INDEX, INTRODUCTIONS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6, Convention on Biological Diversity, EXTINCTIONS, Biology (General), https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1, 106026 Ecosystem research, Biodiversity assessments, Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Global change, Species diversity, Invasive species, native species, Biodiversity inventories, Biodiversity, Biodiversity, Invasive Alien Species, Policy, Phylogenetics, NON-NATIVE SPECIES, inventories, 106026 Ökosystemforschung, Conservation science, Ecosystem functioning, Introduced Species

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	61
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%