
doi: 10.1242/dev.141507
pmid: 28974637
Bilaterality – the possession of two orthogonal body axes – is the name-giving trait of all bilaterian animals. These body axes are established during early embryogenesis and serve as a three-dimensional coordinate system that provides crucial spatial cues for developing cells, tissues, organs and appendages. The emergence of bilaterality was a major evolutionary transition, as it allowed animals to evolve more complex body plans. Therefore, how bilaterality evolved and whether it evolved once or several times independently is a fundamental issue in evolutionary developmental biology. Recent findings from non-bilaterian animals, in particular from Cnidaria, the sister group to Bilateria, have shed new light into the evolutionary origin of bilaterality. Here, we compare the molecular control of body axes in radially and bilaterally symmetric cnidarians and bilaterians, identify the minimal set of traits common for Bilateria, and evaluate whether bilaterality arose once or more than once during evolution.
106010 Developmental biology, 106054 Zoology, Biological Evolution, 106010 Entwicklungsbiologie, 106054 Zoologie, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Animals, Humans, 106012 Evolutionsforschung, Phylogeny, 106012 Evolutionary research, Body Patterning, Signal Transduction
106010 Developmental biology, 106054 Zoology, Biological Evolution, 106010 Entwicklungsbiologie, 106054 Zoologie, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins, Animals, Humans, 106012 Evolutionsforschung, Phylogeny, 106012 Evolutionary research, Body Patterning, Signal Transduction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 93 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
