
Available data on the associations between motor competence (MC) and flexibility are limited and result inconclusive. This study aims to examine the relationship between flexibility and MC in children. The sample comprised 596 Portuguese children (47.1% girls) aged 9.7 ± 0.6 years. Motor competence was evaluated with the body coordination test, Körperkoordination Test für Kinder. Cardiorespiratory fitness (20‐m shuttle run), muscular strength (curl‐up and push‐up tests), and flexibility (back‐saver sit and reach and trunk‐lift tests) were evaluated using the Fitnessgram Test Battery. Z‐scores by age and gender for the physical fitness tests were constructed. Analysis of variance and regression analysis were performed. Participants in the healthy zone groups of both flexibility tests exhibited significantly better scores of MC than the participants under the healthy zone (P < 0.001). Back‐saver sit and reach and trunk‐lift Z‐scores, either individually or as a sum, were significant predictors of MC (P < 0.05 for all) after adjustments for the other physical fitness components, age, body mass index, and socioeconomic status, in both genders. Our findings highlight the importance of promoting and developing flexibility, as well as the other health‐related physical fitness components in schoolchildren to reach adequate levels of MC.
Male, Portugal, Schoolchildren, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Education, Motor competence, Body Mass Index, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Motor Skills, Physical Fitness, Body Composition, Exercise Test, Humans, Female, Muscle Strength, Range of Motion, Articular, Child
Male, Portugal, Schoolchildren, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Education, Motor competence, Body Mass Index, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Motor Skills, Physical Fitness, Body Composition, Exercise Test, Humans, Female, Muscle Strength, Range of Motion, Articular, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
