
handle: 10419/244320
AbstractUsing microdata from 17 OECD countries, this paper documents a negative cross‐country correlation between gender gaps in market hours and wages. We find that the cross‐country differences in market hours are mostly accounted for by female market hours and the size of the sector that produces close substitutes to home production. We quantify the role played by taxes and family care subsidies on the two gender gaps in a multi‐sector model with home production. Higher taxes and lower subsidies reduce the marketization of home production, leading to lower market hours. The effect is largely on women because both home production and the production of its market substitutes are female‐intensive. The larger fall in female market hours reduces relative female labour supply, contributing to a higher female to male wage ratio.
home production, Erwerbsbeteiligung, family policy, subsidy, J22, Steuern, Kinderbetreuung, EVS Trend File 1981-2017 (ZA7503 v3.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.14021); EU-SILC; EU-LFS, internationaler Vergleich, taxes, transfer payments, gender-specific factors, Frau, Transferleistung, Subvention, child care, gender hour ratios, ddc:330, international comparison, Lohnhöhe, marketization, gender wage ratios, wage level, labor force participation, geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren, Familienpolitik, woman, E24, E62, subsidies on family care
home production, Erwerbsbeteiligung, family policy, subsidy, J22, Steuern, Kinderbetreuung, EVS Trend File 1981-2017 (ZA7503 v3.0.0, doi: 10.4232/1.14021); EU-SILC; EU-LFS, internationaler Vergleich, taxes, transfer payments, gender-specific factors, Frau, Transferleistung, Subvention, child care, gender hour ratios, ddc:330, international comparison, Lohnhöhe, marketization, gender wage ratios, wage level, labor force participation, geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren, Familienpolitik, woman, E24, E62, subsidies on family care
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
