
doi: 10.1111/ecca.12026
This paper studies the responses of unemployment in Germany, the USA and the UK to the Great Recession of 2008–9 using Beveridge curve analysis, and in the entire OECD using other techniques. It is shown that the UK suffered from recession but no structural problems; the USA suffered from structural unemployment during the recovery; Germany exhibited a much better performance both during and after the recession. The rise in OECD unemployment is broken down into parts due to aggregate activity, the construction sector and a residual attributed to policies and institutions, which is used to reach conclusions about policy.
economic policy, unemployment, Unemployment, Great Recession, vacancies, Beveridge curve, construction sector, policies and institutions, financial crisis, United Kingdom, United States, Germany, OECD, jel: jel:E24, jel: jel:J6
economic policy, unemployment, Unemployment, Great Recession, vacancies, Beveridge curve, construction sector, policies and institutions, financial crisis, United Kingdom, United States, Germany, OECD, jel: jel:E24, jel: jel:J6
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
