Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Single Event Upsets and Hot Pixels in digital imagers

Authors: Glenn H. Chapman; Rahul Thomas; Rohan Thomas; Klinsmann J. Coelho Silva Meneses; Tommy Q. Yang; Israel Koren; Zahava Koren;

Single Event Upsets and Hot Pixels in digital imagers

Abstract

From extensive study of digital imager defects, we found that permanent “Hot Pixels” are the main long term digital camera defects, and are caused by high energy cosmic ray particles. Clearly, as in other microelectronic integrated circuits, most of the particles do not induce permanent damage but instead, inject a short term charge that may cause a transient fault, known as a Single Event Upset (SEU). Unlike standard digital ICs, pixels in a digital imaging sensor can be monitored at almost any desirable frequency. Since an SEU manifests itself as one or more brighter pixels in an otherwise dark image, the rate of SEUs can be measured at a considerably higher accuracy by taking dark-field pictures at different exposure times and different frequencies. In this paper we describe an experimental approach to measuring the occurrence rate and resulting characteristics of SEUs. The SEU rate that we have observed for digital imagers, of about 4 SEUs for every 30 seconds, is considerably higher than was previously reported for ordinary ICs. For the same imager, permanent hot pixels have a rate of 1 every 12.6 days, while SEUs occur 145,000 times more often. Ordinary IC SEU rates have been reported to be about 100× of permanent fault rates. In addition, we found that some SEUs in digital imagers do not impact a single pixel, as do hot pixels, but can create a line of injected charges which appears as a bright line in the dark image.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!