
Conventional smoothing over complicated coastal and island regions may result in errors across boundaries, due to the use of Euclidean distances to measure interpoint similarity. The new Complex Region Spatial Smoother (CReSS) method presented here uses estimated geodesic distances, model averaging, and a local radial basis function to provide improved smoothing over complex domains. CReSS is compared, via simulation, with recent related smoothing techniques, Thin Plate Splines (TPS), geodesic low rank TPS (GLTPS), and the Soap film smoother (SOAP). The GLTPS method cannot be used in areas with islands and SOAP can be hard to parameterize. CReSS is comparable with, if not better than, all considered methods on a range of simulations. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Geodesic distance, QA Mathematics, QA, Thin plate splines, Local radial basis, 004, Model averaging
Geodesic distance, QA Mathematics, QA, Thin plate splines, Local radial basis, 004, Model averaging
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
