
doi: 10.1037/a0023361
pmid: 21604838
This study examined the newly developed ethnic identity measures of the Ethnic Identity Scale (EIS) and the Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure-Revised (MEIM-R) from psychometric and theoretical perspectives. Survey data from 289 counseling students in California were analyzed. Confirmatory factor analyses supported three correlated factors of the EIS (exploration, resolution, and affirmation) and two correlated factors of the MEIM-R (exploration, commitment) for both European American and minority students. Consistent with the theories of Erikson's and Marcia's identity development, the EIS and the MEIM-R nicely depicted (a) Marcia's 4 (2 × 2) identity statuses of diffusion, foreclosure, moratorium, and achievement and (b) the hierarchy of identity statuses in relation to subjective well-being as an indicator of adjustment, especially for minority students. Additionally, European American and minority students revealed differences as to the salience and importance of ethnic identity. Recommendations for using the EIS and the MEIM-R are provided.
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Psychometrics, Social Identification, Universities, Data Collection, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, California, Self Concept, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Ethnicity, Humans, Female, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Students
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Male, Psychometrics, Social Identification, Universities, Data Collection, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, California, Self Concept, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Ethnicity, Humans, Female, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Students
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 95 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
