Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Review of Palaeobota...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
HAL-INSU
Article . 2008
Data sources: HAL-INSU
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The diversity of the Carboniferous phytoplankton

Authors: Mullins, G.L.; Servais, Thomas;

The diversity of the Carboniferous phytoplankton

Abstract

Here were present a synthesis of the published literature on in situ Carboniferous acritarchs, prasinophyte algae and associated microfossils. The Early Carboniferous had a rich acritarch fossil record, with assemblages documented in both equatorial and high latitude regions. However, the data suggest that there was no relationship between acritarch diversity and palaeolatitude in the Early Carboniferous. Our synthesis reveals a trend of declining acritarch diversity from the Tournaisian to the Visean, and generally very low diversity in the latest Early Carboniferous Serpukhovian and Late Carboniferous. However, fairly diverse acritarch assemblages of up to 13 taxa have been described from the Late Carboniferous of England and South America. They imply that the very low diversity so far documented could result from a lack of research input. However, these assemblages need to be re-examined as they can be based on a limited number of individuals and taxonomic over-splitting is a possibility. Furthermore, the reworking of older assemblages into these Late Carboniferous strata needs to be thoroughly discounted. The data also suggests a trend of declining prasinophyte diversity through the Carboniferous. However, the very low number of taxa typically reported and their grouping under open nomenclature (e.g. Cymatiosphaera spp.) makes this trend of questionable robustness. No clear pattern was observed in the diversity of the Zygnemataceae, although more diverse assemblages could be related to increased terrestrial influence or continental deposition. The drop in acritarch diversity in the Early Carboniferous represents a continuation of a decline that began in the Late Devonian. Although a number of hypotheses have been invoked to account for this Devonian-Carboniferous diversity decline, our synthesis has shown that the phytoplankton from this interval are generally poorly studied, with only a handful of investigations having been completed in stratigraphically continuous sequences. Further work is urgently needed if we are to evaluate these hypotheses and understand this fundamental change in the nature of the ocean's primary producers.

Country
France
Keywords

Carboniferous, Zygnemataceae, acritarchs, Prasinophyceae, [SDU.STU.PG] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Paleontology, Hydrodictyaceae, diversity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    35
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
35
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?