
Abstract In this paper we are concerned with the effects of categorial shift on action deverbal nouns formed by means of the suffix -ing in English and its counterpart -ung in German in the history of the two languages. While the two cognate suffixes exhibit similar degrees of categorial shift in terms of the coarse properties that they preserve from the base verbal category or acquire from the new nominal category, they turn out to exhibit opposite preferences with respect to the aspectual value of the base verb that they attach to, with subtle correlated effects in their morphosyntactic and semantic behavior. Specifically, -ing derives action nominals that highlight a process reading, while -ung is restricted to telic verbs and contributes a result reading. We show that at earlier stages of the two languages, the two suffixes were aspectually more flexible. We explain the present-day contrast through internal and external factors that relate to the competition with newly emerging suffixes, but also to the different evolution of grammatical gender in the two languages and its impact on the countability properties of derived nouns. We conclude that in its evolution -ung completed the full cycle of categorial shift of an action nominalization, while -ing remains slightly closer to the original verbal category due to its process-oriented interpretation.
602008 Anglistik, 602004 Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 602004 General linguistics, 602014 Germanistik, 602014 German studies, 602008 English studies
602008 Anglistik, 602004 Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 602004 General linguistics, 602014 Germanistik, 602014 German studies, 602008 English studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
