
A reliable database is established from the analysis of 500 French royal jellies (RJ). Diversity of geographical origins, harvesting seasons, and forage sources were taken into account. Authenticity intervals for numerous physicochemical parameters have been established from French RJs, obtained without bee-feeding with artificial sugars or proteins. RJs from Italy and non-European countries, derived from feeding experiments, were analysed and compared with the database. Differences in 10-HDA, d13C and sugars (sucrose, erlose, maltose, maltotriose) contents were observed. Sucrose and erlose contents in French RJs were less than 1.8 and 0.4%, respectively, whereas they attained 3.9 and 2.0% in some commercial samples and 7.7 and 1.7% in RJs produced by sugarcane feeding. Maltose and maltotriose contents were less than 1.0 and 0.2% in French RJs, and they can attain levels of 2.6 and 0.4% in commercial samples; they can be as high as 5.5 and 1.7% in RJs obtained by bee-feeding with starch hydrolysate syrups. RJs obtained with and without feeding exhibit d13C values ranging from 26.45 to 23.73%, and from 26.05 to 14.65%, respectively. This study could be used to discriminate different production methods and provide a useful tool for identifying unknown commercial RJs. Highlights A total of 750 royal jellies (RJs) from different origins were studied. Origins included domestic, imported, obtained by bee-feeding. French RJ samples were chemically characterised. Authenticity intervals were calculated for authentic RJs. Sucrose, erlose, maltose, maltotriose and δ13C contents are bee-feeding markers.
[CHIM.ANAL] Chemical Sciences/Analytical chemistry, Protein, Food analysis, Royal jelly, Principal component analysis, Water, IRMS, 10-HDA, Amino acids, Food composition, Sugars
[CHIM.ANAL] Chemical Sciences/Analytical chemistry, Protein, Food analysis, Royal jelly, Principal component analysis, Water, IRMS, 10-HDA, Amino acids, Food composition, Sugars
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
