Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1996 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object
Data sources: DBLP
MPG.PuRe
Conference object . 1996
Data sources: MPG.PuRe
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Vertex partitioning problems on partial k-trees

Authors: Gupta, A.; Kaller, D.; Mahajan, S.; Shermer, T.;

Vertex partitioning problems on partial k-trees

Abstract

We describe a general approach to obtain polynomial-time algorithms over partial k-trees for graph problems in which the vertex set is to be partitioned in some way. We encode these problems with formulae of the Extended Monadic Second-order (or EMS) logic. Such a formula can be translated into a polynomial-time algorithm automatically. We focus on the problem of partitioning a partial k-tree into induced subgraphs isomorphic to a fixed pattern graph; a distinct algorithm is derived for each pattern graph and each value of k. We use a “pumping lemma” to show that (for some pattern graphs) this problem cannot be encoded in the “ordinary” Monadic Second-order logic—from which a linear-time algorithm over partial k-trees would be obtained. Hence, an EMS formula is in some sense the strongest possible. As a further application of our general approach, we derive a polynomial-time algorithm to determine the maximum number of co-dominating sets into which the vertices of a partial k-tree can be partitioned. (A co-dominating set of a graph is a dominating set of its complement graph).

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!