
doi: 10.1002/hec.1284
pmid: 17705333
AbstractThis paper proposes an axiomatic foundation for new measures of polarization that can be applied to ordinal distributions such as self‐assessed health (SAH) data. This is an improvement over the existing measures of polarization that can be used only for cardinal variables. The new measures of polarization avoid one difficulty that the related measures for evaluating health inequalities face. Indeed, inequality measures are mean based, and since only cardinal variables have a mean, SAH has to be cardinalized to compute a mean, which can then be used to calculate an inequality measure. In contrast, the new polarization measures are median based and hence do not require to impose cardinal scaling on the categories. After deriving the properties of these new polarization measures, we provide an empirical illustration using data from the British Household Panel Survey that demonstrates that SAH polarization is also a relevant question on empirical grounds, and that the polarization measures are adequate to evaluate polarization phenomena whereas inequality measures are not adequate in these cases. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Family Characteristics, Self Disclosure, 330, Ordinal variables, Health Status Disparities, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Self-assessed health, United Kingdom, Inequality, Socioeconomic Factors, Polarization, Health Status Indicators, Humans, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Attitude to Health, Models, Econometric
Family Characteristics, Self Disclosure, 330, Ordinal variables, Health Status Disparities, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Self-assessed health, United Kingdom, Inequality, Socioeconomic Factors, Polarization, Health Status Indicators, Humans, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Attitude to Health, Models, Econometric
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 77 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
