Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1002/cjs.10051
handle: 10016/5644
AbstractThe authors propose to estimate nonlinear small area population parameters by using the empirical Bayes (best) method, based on a nested error model. They focus on poverty indicators as particular nonlinear parameters of interest, but the proposed methodology is applicable to general nonlinear parameters. They use a parametric bootstrap method to estimate the mean squared error of the empirical best estimators. They also study small sample properties of these estimators by model‐based and design‐based simulation studies. Results show large reductions in mean squared error relative to direct area‐specific estimators and other estimators obtained by “simulated” censuses. The authors also apply the proposed method to estimate poverty incidences and poverty gaps in Spanish provinces by gender with mean squared errors estimated by the mentioned parametric bootstrap method. For the Spanish data, results show a significant reduction in coefficient of variation of the proposed empirical best estimators over direct estimators for practically all domains. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 38: 369–385; 2010 © 2010 Statistical Society of Canada
Applications of statistics to social sciences, Small area estimation, Bootstrap, jackknife and other resampling methods, Computational problems in statistics, Estadística, empirical best estimator, Empirical best estimator, parametric bootstrap, Empirical decision procedures; empirical Bayes procedures, Applications of statistics to economics, Poverty mapping, Parametric bootstrap
Applications of statistics to social sciences, Small area estimation, Bootstrap, jackknife and other resampling methods, Computational problems in statistics, Estadística, empirical best estimator, Empirical best estimator, parametric bootstrap, Empirical decision procedures; empirical Bayes procedures, Applications of statistics to economics, Poverty mapping, Parametric bootstrap
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 200 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 37 | |
| downloads | 100 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts