Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Repository of the Fa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Epifitska flora na palmi Phoenix canariensis Chabaud u Hrvatskoj

Authors: Zubčić, Iskra Mara;

Epifitska flora na palmi Phoenix canariensis Chabaud u Hrvatskoj

Abstract

Epiphytic flora on the palms Phoenix canariensis researched at 16 sites along the Croatian Adriatic coast and islands (Split, Trogir, Zadar, Opatija, Cavtat, Dubrovnik, Pula, Mali Losinj, Ploce, Makarska, and islands Rava, Brac, Hvar, Vis, Rab and Ugljan). There have been recorded 104 species classified into 53 families. The most represented families are Poaceae (10.6%), Cichoriaceae (6.7%) and Scrophulariaceae (5.8%). Cover of epiphytes is largest in Split (76), and the lowest in Pula (15.5). Cover decreases (r = -0.51) with the decrease in annual precipitation, and increases with pH (r = 0.66). The largest abundance of epiphytes is on the island of Hvar (1.93) and the lowest on the island of Rava (1.03). Largest pH value of humus was determined on Hvar (6.74) and the lowest in Pula (4.29). The most common life forms are therophytes (39.8%), phanerophytes (27.2%) and hemicryptophytes (18.4%). Number phanerophytes growing in geographic direction W - E (r = 0.74). The analysis of floral elements of epiphytes found the most cultivated and adventive plants (25%), Mediterranean (23.1%) and wide spread plants (15.4%). The most common fruit of epiphytes is a capsula (27.9%), bacca (12.5%), and achaenium (11.5%). The most common methods of dispersal are ornitochory (32.2%), myrmecochory (28.3%), and anemochory (21.9%).

Epifitska flora na palmama vrste Phoenix canariensis istraživana je na 16 lokaliteta duž hrvatske jadranske obale i otoka (Split, Trogir, Zadar, Opatija, Cavtat, Dubrovnik, Pula, Mali Lošinj, Ploče, Makarska, te otoci Rava, Brač, Hvar, Vis, Rab i Ugljan). Zabilježene su 104 svojte razvrstane u 53 porodice. Najzastupljenije su Poaceae (10,6 %), Cichoriaceae (6,7 %) te Scrophulariaceae (5,8 %). Pokrovnost epifita najveća je na palmama u Splitu (76), a najmanja u Puli (15,5). Pokrovnost opada (r = -0,51) sa smanjenjem godišnjih oborina, a raste s porastom pH (r = 0,66). Brojnost epifita najveća na palmama otoka Hvara (1,93), a najmanja na otoku Ravi (1,03). Najveća pH vrijednosti humusa je na Hvaru (6,74), a najmanja u Puli (4,29). Najučestaliji životni oblici su terofiti (39,8%), fanerofiti (27,2%) te hemikriptofiti (18,4%). Broj fanerofita u obraštaju raste u geografskom smjeru Z - I (r = 0,74). Utvrđeno je najviše kultiviranih i adventivnih biljaka (25%), općemediteranskih (23,1%) te biljaka šroke rasprostranjenosti (15,4%). Najčešći plod epifita je tobolac (27,9 %), zatim boba (12,5 %), te roška (11,5%). Najzastupljeniji načini rasprostranjivanja epifita su ornitohorija (32,2%), mirmekohorija (28,3 %) i anemohorija (21,9 %).

Country
Croatia
Related Organizations
Keywords

epifiti, palma, epiphytes, PRIRODNE ZNANOSTI. Biologija., Adriatic coast and islands, NATURAL SCIENCES. Biology., jadranska obala i otoci, palm

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!