Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Agritroparrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Agritrop
Conference object . 2020
Data sources: Agritrop
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
HAL INRAE
Conference object . 2020
Data sources: HAL INRAE
Acta Horticulturae
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Is machine learning efficient for mango yield estimation when used under heterogeneous field conditions?

Authors: Sarron, J.; Sané, C.A.B.; Borianne, Philippe; Malézieux, E.; Nordey, T.; Normand, F.; Diatta, P.; +2 Authors

Is machine learning efficient for mango yield estimation when used under heterogeneous field conditions?

Abstract

In the last decade, image analysis using machine learning algorithms proved its potential for the detection and counting of plant organs. Numerous studies provided fruit tree yield estimates based on machine learning with high levels of efficiency. However, most of these studies were conducted under homogeneous conditions of fruit aspect. The aim of this study was to develop an efficient machine learning method for ripe mango fruit detection from RGB images and to test it under heterogeneous field conditions for tree yield estimation in Senegal. The algorithm consisted in a k-nearest neighbours classification based on colour and texture features followed by a post-treatment based on shape indices. The F1 score, which accounts for both precision and recall performances, reached 0.73 for a set of 42 images of 'Kent' trees in homogeneous conditions. When performed on a second set of 128 images representing the actual heterogeneity in tree structure (height, canopy volume) and cultivars ('Kent', 'Keitt' and 'Boucodiekhal') found in the Niayes region of Senegal, the F1 score fell to 0.48. This decrease resulted from the heterogeneous field conditions in terms of fruit size, fruit colour and light exposure caused by different tree structures among cultivars. Despite the algorithm was less efficient under these conditions, significant linear relationships were evidenced between the number of detected fruits and the actual number of fruits per tree for each cultivar ('Kent': R2=0.92, 'Keitt': R2=0.93, and 'Boucodiekhal': R2=0.90). These models were cross-validated and reached a relative RMSE of 14%. Those results offer new opportunities to accurately and rapidly estimate mango yield and to further identify the parameters that drive its variability at the tree and orchard scales.

Keywords

[SDE.BE] Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology, k-nearest neighbours, Algorithm efficiency, Automated fruit counting, [SDV.BID.SPT] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity/Systematics, Phylogenetics and taxonomy, [SDV.EE.ECO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment/Ecosystems, Senegal, Image analysis, [SDV.BV.BOT] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Vegetal Biology/Botanics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
INRAE
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!