
handle: 11104/0308179
AbstractExact two-tailed tests and two-sided confidence intervals (CIs) for a binomial proportion or Poisson parameter by Sterne (Biometrika 41:117–129, 1954) or Blaker (Can J Stat 28(4):783–798, 2000) are successful in reducing conservatism of the Clopper–Pearson method. However, the methods suffer from an inconsistency between the tests and the corresponding CIs: In some cases, a parameter value is rejected by the test, though it lies in the CI. The problem results from non-unimodality of the test p value functions. We propose a slight modification of the tests that avoids the inconsistency, while preserving nestedness and exactness. Fast and accurate algorithms for both the test modification and calculation of confidence bounds are presented together with their theoretical background.
Computational algorithm, Parametric tolerance and confidence regions, Sterne’s and Blaker’s exact confidence interval, binomial model, exact test, Binomial model, computational algorithm, Sterne's and Blaker's exact confidence interval, Poisson model, Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics, Exact test
Computational algorithm, Parametric tolerance and confidence regions, Sterne’s and Blaker’s exact confidence interval, binomial model, exact test, Binomial model, computational algorithm, Sterne's and Blaker's exact confidence interval, Poisson model, Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics, Exact test
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
