Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Universita Ciencia
Article . 2020
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Educación diferenciada y coeducación, las mejores prácticas educativas

Authors: Leticia Margarita Esparza Aspinwall;

Educación diferenciada y coeducación, las mejores prácticas educativas

Abstract

{"references": ["Aguil\u00f3, A. (2015). Educaci\u00f3n diferenciada. 50 respuestas para un debate. Digital Reasons.", "Aguil\u00f3, A. (2019). Conferencia Educaci\u00f3n diferenciada. Junta Nacional FAPACE.", "Ahedo, J. (2015). El fundamento antropol\u00f3gico de la educaci\u00f3n diferenciada. Estudios sobre la educaci\u00f3n, 28, 155-170. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.28", "Arag\u00f3n, E., Serrano, N., Navarro, J. (2018). Do boys and girls learn the same way? Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 16(3), 537-553.", "Del Amo, M. (2009). La educaci\u00f3n de las mujeres en Espa\u00f1a: de la amiga a la universidad. Participaci\u00f3n educativa, 11, 8-12. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3105347 ISSN 1886-5097", "Departamento de Educaci\u00f3n de Estados Unidos (2005). Single-Sex Versus Secondary Schooling: A Systematic Review.", "Dodero, M. (2012). La joven espartana y su participaci\u00f3n en la ciudad lacedemonia. Antesteria, 28 (1),19-28.", "Echavarri, M., Godoy, J., Olaz, F. (2007). Diferencias de g\u00e9nero en habilidades cognitivas y rendimiento acad\u00e9mico en estudiantes universitarios. Universitas Psychologica, 6 (2), 314-329", "Espinosa, C. (2010). Diferencias entre hombres y mujeres en educaci\u00f3n matem\u00e1tica: \u00bfQu\u00e9 pasa en M\u00e9xico? Investigaci\u00f3n y Ciencia, Universidad Aut\u00f3noma de Aguascalientes, 18 (46), 28-35", "Gordillo, E. (2015). Historia de la educaci\u00f3n mixta y su difusi\u00f3n en la educaci\u00f3n formal occidental. Revista Historia de la Educaci\u00f3n Latinoamericana, 17(25), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.19053/01227238.3814", "Kelleher, C.(2009). Barriers to Programming Engagement. Advances in Gender and Education, 1, 5-10.", "Lenroot, R. K., Gogtay, N., Greenstein, D. K., Wells, E. M., Wallace, G. L., Clasen, L. S., Giedd, J. N. (2007). Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. NeuroImage, 36(4), 1065\u20131073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.053", "McGivern, R., Adams, B., Handa, R., Pineda, J. (2012). Men and Women Exhibit a Differential Bias for Processing Movement versus Objects. PLOS ONE 7(3): e32238. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032238", "Mojica, C.(2017).A Learning Experience of the Gender Perspective in English Teaching Contexts. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 19 (1):139. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n1.56209", "Nasser, A. (2016). The Difference Between Girls and Boys in Learning.", "OECD (2019). https://data.oecd.org/pisa/science-performance-pisa.htm", "Piechura-Couture, K., Heins, E., Tichenor, M. (2011). The Boy Factor: Can Single-Gender Classes Reduce the Over-Representation of Boys in Special Education? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38(4),255-263", "Rojas, R. (2011). Classroom interaction and language learning among boys in coed and single-sex contexts. Revista Ensayos Pedag\u00f3gicos, 6(1), 145-158.", "Sax, L. (2017). Why Gender Matters. Ten Speed.", "Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613\u2013629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613", "Wikberg, S. (2013). Art education \u2013 mostly for girls?, Education Inquiry, 4(3), https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i3.22630", "Wink, K. (2015). Rhetorical Strategies for Composition: Cracking an Academic Code. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.", "Younger, M., Warrington, M., Gray, J., Rudduck, J., McIellan, R., Bearne, E., Kernesh, R., Bricheno, P. (2004). Raising Boys' Achievement. University of Cambridge Faculty of Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242599270_Raising_Boys'_Achievement [accessed Nov 24 2019]."]}

El desarrollo físico, neurológico, cognitivo y socioemocional de niños y niñas es distinto. La coeducación sostiene que la convivencia entre niños y niñas los enriquece, mientras que la educación diferenciada sostiene que los grupos homogéneos por género respetan las diferencias en el desarrollo y favorecen el crecimiento personal. Las diferencias en el desarrollo se ven reflejadas en modos distintos de aprender que pueden ser aprovechados en aulas de estudiantes de un mismo sexo; existen investigaciones que demuestran que la educación diferenciada da como resultado un mejor aprendizaje en materias como matemáticas, inglés, arte y lengua. La educación diferenciada no es un modelo que discrimina a ninguno de los sexos, es un modelo que promueve la justica ayudando a no tratar igual a los que tienen necesidades distintasEl desarrollo físico, neurológico, cognitivo y socioemocional de niños y niñas es distinto. La coeducación sostiene que la convivencia entre niños y niñas los enriquece, mientras que la educación diferenciada sostiene que los grupos homogéneos por género respetan las diferencias en el desarrollo y favorecen el crecimiento personal. Las diferencias en el desarrollo se ven reflejadas en modos distintos de aprender que pueden ser aprovechados en aulas de estudiantes de un mismo sexo; existen investigaciones que demuestran que la educación diferenciada da como resultado un mejor aprendizaje en materias como matemáticas, inglés, arte y lengua. La educación diferenciada no es un modelo que discrimina a ninguno de los sexos, es un modelo que promueve la justica ayudando a no tratar igual a los que tienen necesidades distintas

Keywords

Social sciences (General), H1-99, Educación diferenciada, Educación mixta, Modelos educativos

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 15
    download downloads 12
  • 15
    views
    12
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
15
12
Green
gold