USING BLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY TO ANALYZE READING COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS IN TEAM UP IN ENGLISH 1-3 AND GRADE 9 ENGLISH O-NET TESTS

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 31 Jul 2017Publisher:Granthaalayah Publications and PrintersJournal:International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, volume 5, pages 31-41 (issn: 2394-3629, eissn: 2350-0530,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Pornpimon Tangsakul; Wachiraporn Kijpoonphol; Nguyen Duy Linh; Lugsamee Nuamthanom Kimura;

doi: 10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i7.2017.2106 , 10.5281/zenodo.826733 , 10.5281/zenodo.826732

USING BLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY TO ANALYZE READING COMPREHENSION QUESTIONS IN TEAM UP IN ENGLISH 1-3 AND GRADE 9 ENGLISH O-NET TESTS

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

The aim of the study was to use Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy 2001 or Anderson & Krathwohl’s Taxonomy 2001 to analyze and compare the levels of reading comprehension questions found in reading parts of Team Up in English 1-3 and Grade 9 English O-NET Tests academic years 2013-2016. This study examined 416 reading comprehension questions from Team Up in English 1-3 and 65 reading comprehension questions from O-NET Tests academic years 2013-2016. Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy 2001 was used as a framework for analyzing levels of reading comprehension questions. The findings showed that the levels of reading comprehension questions found in Team Up in English 1-3 and Grade 9 English O-NET tests academic years 2013-2016 were similar and were in low levels of reading comprehension questions.

Related Organizations

Ubon Ratchathani University
Thailand
Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University
Thailand

Keywords

English Textbooks; O-NET Test; Levels of Reading Comprehension Questions; Bloom's Revised Taxonomy 2001; Anderson and Krathwohl's Taxonomy 2001.

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	4
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average