Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2022
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Hal
Conference object . 2022
Data sources: Hal
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
HAL INRAE
Conference object . 2022
Data sources: HAL INRAE
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Assessment of French multi-actors' expectations on milk and dairy products quality and authentication

Authors: Albert, F.; Bedoin, F.; Couzy, C.; Martin, Bruno; Laithier, Cécile;

Assessment of French multi-actors' expectations on milk and dairy products quality and authentication

Abstract

Le projet de recherche européen INTAQT vise à développer des outils innovants pour l’évaluation et l’authentification de la qualité des viandes de boeuf et de poulet, du lait et des produits laitiers. Il cherche à objectiver le lien entre les modes d’élevage et les critères de qualité intrinsèques de ces produits. Au coeur de la démarche, l’implication de groupes d’acteurs organisés par type de produit : producteurs, transformateurs, distributeurs, associations consuméristes et citoyennes, permet de prendre en compte leurs attentes et craintes. Au début du projet, l’objectif de ces consultations est de formuler des recommandations pour intégrer au dispositif expérimental 1/ des systèmes et pratiques d’élevages d’intérêt pour les acteurs, 2/ des critères de qualité et analyses selon les besoins exprimés. Par ailleurs, l’objectif du projet est de construire un outil de score multicritère, synthétisant l’ensemble des critères de qualité étudiés, et d’en recueillir les attentes et craintes des groupes d’acteurs. Pour y parvenir, des entretiens individuels ont été conduits. En France, 17 acteurs de la filière bovine laitière ont fait l’objet d’entretiens qualitatifs sur leur vision de la qualité, les liens avec l’élevage et leurs réactions sur les différents points du projet. Les critères organoleptique, sanitaire, technologique et nutritionnel constituant la qualité intrinsèque des produits laitiers ont été cités spontanément par tous les types d’acteurs. Il en est de même pour les critères extrinsèques de « naturalité », environnement, bien-être animal, social, et des conditions d’élevage. Le besoin de transparence et de visibilité des modes d’élevage et de la transformation ressort comme un enjeu central, partagé par tous les acteurs. L’environnement, le bien-être animal, la « naturalité des produits » et de la simplification des recettes (limitation des additifs…), sont perçues comme des enjeux croissants. Tandis que la substitution des produits laitiers par les produits végétaux ou de synthèse, représente aux yeux de certains une menace future. Les attentes des acteurs sur le projet INTAQT font écho aux opinions exprimées sur les perspectives d’évolution de la qualité des produits laitiers. Enfin, l’outil de score multicritère divise les acteurs. Certains d’entre eux y voient une opportunité de « contrecarrer » le Nutriscore. D’autres redoutent d’apporter une information supplémentaire complexe à comprendre pour le consommateur. Dans tous les cas, il s’agit de bien définir la cible, et les messages à faire passer. Ces consultations ont permis de mettre au coeur de ce projet de recherche européen les attentes des professionnels et sociétales. Les recommandations permettront de moduler les dispositifs expérimentaux et d’apporter des éléments scientifiques objectivés pour y répondre.

The H2020 European research project INTAQT aims at developing innovative tools to assess and authenticate beef, chicken, milk and dairy products quality. This project studies more specifically the link between husbandry systems and intrinsic quality criteria. A group of stakeholders is involved to consider their expectations, suggestions and concerns. They represent the whole supply chain, from farmers, to dairy plants, retailers up to citizens and consumers organizations. Their consultations were meant to address recommendations to add to the experimental dispositive 1/ husbandry systems and practices of interest to them, 2/ quality criteria, and analysis according to the expressed needs. Furthermore, one of the challenges in the project is to build a synthetic multicriteria scoring tool including the quality criteria studied and consider stakeholders’ expectations and fears. In France, 17 qualitative interviews were led with stakeholders on their views on dairy product quality, its link to husbandry and their reaction about the project. The organoleptic, safety, technological and nutritional criteria, referred as intrinsic dairy product quality were cited spontaneously. As well as the extrinsic factors of naturalness, environment, animal welfare, social aspect and rearing conditions. The need for transparency and visibility related to husbandry and dairy process are considered by all the stakeholders as a central stake. Environment, animal welfare, products naturalness and the recipes simplification are regarded as growing challenges. On the opposite, dairy products substitution by vegetal products or synthetic products represents a real threat to some of them. The stakeholders’ expectations on the INTAQT project echo the opinions expressed on the dairy products quality evolution perspectives. Lastly, the multicriteria scoring tool divides the stakeholders. For some of them, this tool could be an opportunity to counterbalance the Nutriscore. Some others fear to bring more complex information to understand to the consumer, getting lost. In any case, stakeholders advised to define precisely the target of such a tool, and the messages to deliver. Those consultations allowed to consider the professional and societal expectations as core questions of this European research program. They will enable to bring some implementations to the experimental dispositive, considering its feasibility. Thus, it will bring objectified scientific elements to answer to those expectations.

Country
France
Keywords

[SDV.AEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 17
    download downloads 18
  • 17
    views
    18
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
17
18
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities
INRAE