Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Rotation plays an important role in the life of stars, and offers a potential diagnostic to infer their ages via gyrochronology. Currently, however, gyrochronology faces critical challenges. Recent results from cluster studies and asteroseismology have shown that stars deviate from a simple Skumanich-type spin-down, and rather follow a more complex evolution with stalling in their rotation rates, gaps in the period vs. temperature diagram, and weakened magnetic braking in stars more evolved than the Sun. A detailed understanding of these phenomena, however, is currently limited by the lack of calibrators at old ages. In this talk, I will demonstrate how wide-separation binaries identified by Gaia can help address these issues. The components of a given binary are co-eval and taken together they can provide exquisite gyrochronology assessments. Particularly, I will discuss the outstanding opportunity that main sequence-white dwarf binaries present for expanding the existing rotational constraints in unprecedented age (and metallicity) regimes. Systems with a white dwarf component can be age-dated through stellar evolution modeling, and this may be complemented with rotation period measurements for their main-sequence companions, e.g., by using photometric data from the TESS mission. In this way, these systems will produce the unprecedented and much-needed age-rotation constraints that are necessary for a thorough understanding of the complex angular momentum evolution of low-mass stars. All in all, this work sets up the stage for decisive spin-down assessments and gyrochronology calibrations in the era of ever-expanding space-based photometry and astrometry.
{"references": ["Curtis, J. L., Ag\u00fceros, M. A., Matt, S. P., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 140", "Gordon, T. A., Davenport, J. R. A., Angus, R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 913, 70", "van Saders, J. L., Ceillier, T., Metcalfe, T. S., et al. 2016, Natur, 529, 181", "Dhital S., West A. A., Stassun K. G., Bochanski J. J., 2010, AJ, 139, 2566", "Godoy-Rivera, D., Pinsonneault, M. H., & Rebull, L. M. 2021, ApJS, 257, 46", "Raghavan D. et al., 2010, ApJS, 190, 1", "Chanam\u00e9, J., & Ram\u00edrez, I. 2012, ApJ, 746, 102", "Godoy-Rivera, D., & Chanam\u00e9, J. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 4440", "El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., & Heintz, T. M. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 2269", "Qiu, D., Tian, H.-J., Wang, X.-D., et al. 2021, ApJS, 253, 58", "Garc\u00eda, R. A., Ceillier, T., Salabert, D., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, A34", "Handberg, R., Lund, M. N., White, T. R., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 170", "Silva-Beyer, J., Godoy-Rivera D., & Chanam\u00e9, J. 2022, arXiv:2210.01137", "Kraus, A. L., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2009, ApJ, 704, 531", "Espinoza-Rojas, F., Chanam\u00e9, J., Jofr\u00e9, P., & Casamiquela, L. 2021, ApJ, 920, 94", "Amard, L., & Matt, S. P. 2020, ApJ, 889, 108", "Andrews J. J., Chanam\u00e9 J., Ag\u00fceros M. A., 2017, MNRAS, 472, 675", "Wright, N. J., Newton, E. R., Williams, P. K. G., Drake, J. J., & Yadav, R. K. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 2351", "Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2022, arXiv:2208.00211", "Creevey, O. L., Sordo, R., Pailler, F., et al. 2022, arXiv:2206.05864"]}
binary stars, techniques: photometric, stars: low-mass, stars: rotation
binary stars, techniques: photometric, stars: low-mass, stars: rotation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 29 | |
| downloads | 24 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts