Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Pseudocereals are best known for three crops derived from the Andes: quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa, Chenopods I), canihua (C. pallidicaule, Chenopods I), and kiwicha (Amaranthus caudatus). Their grains are recognized for their nutritional benefits; however, there is a higher level of polyphenism and the chemical foundation that would rely with such polyphenism has not been thoroughly investigated. Meanwhile, the chemical food safety of pseudocereals remains poorly documented. Here we applied untargeted and targeted metabolomics approach by LC-MS to achieve both: i) a comprehensive chemical mapping of pseudocereal samples collected in the Andes to classify them according to their chemotype; ii) a quantification of their contents in emerging mycotoxins. An inventory of the fungal community was also realized with the aims to better know the filamentous fungi present in these grains and try to parallel this information with the presence of the molecules produced, especially mycotoxins. Metabotyping permitted to add new insights into the chemotaxonomy of pseudocereals, confirming the previously established phylotranscriptomic clades: Chenopods I (clusters quinoa and canihua), and Amaranthaceae s.s. (cluster kiwicha). Moreover, we report for the first time the presence of mycotoxins in pseudocereals. Sixteen samples of Peru (out of 27) and one sample from France (out of one) were contaminated with Beauvericin, an emerging mycotoxin. There were several mycotoxigenic fungi detected, including Aspergillus sp., Penicillium sp., and Alternaria sp., but not Fusaria.
mycotoxins, Andean pseudecereals, fungal communities, metabotyping
mycotoxins, Andean pseudecereals, fungal communities, metabotyping
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts