Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This study investigated the Brazilian classification system for research and graduate education. The motivations behind the system design were examined, as well as some central factors in its evolution and expansion. From this, it was possible to identify that the current system became somewhat peculiar in its distinctions from international classification systems such as OECD’s Fields of Research and Development (FORD) and the International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED). In particular, the misalignment among the evaluation and broad areas of the Brazilian system and their corresponding levels in the analysed alternatives is significant, especially in the SSH profiles.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 | |
| downloads | 10 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts