Downloads provided by UsageCounts
While the movement for OS has gained momentum in recent years, there remain concerns about how to recognise researchers’ efforts in OS and how to change the research assessment systems toward more responsible and encompassing ones. Apart from some efforts being taken for example in the Netherlands, there are few examples how universities could embed OS into their incentivisation structures; a gap this project aims to cover. We present two proposals promoted by the YUFE alliance: an OS indicator toolkit for evaluating researchers’ performance in OS and an incentivisation initiative to foster open science at the research group level. These initiatives operate with different incentives (connecting OS performance in recruitment processes; tangible rewards, and advocating OS by showing off institutional forerunner research groups; symbolic rewards). The project provides new insights into the open knowledge landscape within the European YUFE alliance and beyond, and ways of promoting OS paths in the institutional framework.
Open Science, FOS, Evaluación de la investigación, Research Assessment, Ciencia abierta, Biblioteconomía y Documentación, YUFE
Open Science, FOS, Evaluación de la investigación, Research Assessment, Ciencia abierta, Biblioteconomía y Documentación, YUFE
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 108 | |
| downloads | 49 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts