Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2017
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

COMPARISON OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND MAINSTREAM TEACHERS' EFFICACY TOWARDS INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PROGRAMME CLASSROOMS IN MALAYSIA

Authors: Yin, Teng Kie; Jiar, Yeo Kee; Hadijah Jaffri;

COMPARISON OF SPECIAL EDUCATION AND MAINSTREAM TEACHERS' EFFICACY TOWARDS INCLUSIVE EDUCATION PROGRAMME CLASSROOMS IN MALAYSIA

Abstract

Teachers’ efficacy in catering diverse students’ learning needs in Inclusive Education (IE) Programme classrooms is crucial to determine the successfulness of its implementation. The purpose of this study is to identify the difference on the level of teachers’ efficacy towards IE Programme classrooms across teachers’ groups (special education and mainstream teachers) as some oversea studies showed the level of teachers’ efficacy towards IE Programme classrooms teaching depended on the types of teachers. A set of questionnaire with 11 items on Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) in Malaysian context has been distributed to 267 teachers (mainstream: 217 and special education: 50) from 21 public primary schools with IE Programme. The findings indicated that special education teachers had higher mean scores than mainstream teachers in both of the factors, pedagogy efficacy (TE1) and management efficacy (TE2). However, the multivariate tests in MANOVA demonstrated that teachers’ groups (special education and mainstream teachers) had no significant effect towards the level of TE1 and TE2. Therefore, there is no evidence that special education teachers are more efficient than mainstream teachers in IE classrooms. Therefore, well-planned teacher education and professional development programmes are needed to equip both types of teachers with the knowledge and competencies that are required, and also to ensure them to come to a consensus in implementing IE Programme in Malaysia.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Special education teachers, Mainstream teachers, Teachers" Efficacy, Inclusive Education Programme

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 5
  • 4
    views
    5
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
5
Green