
The Hywind Scotland Pilot Park located off the east coast of Scotland has been in operation since 2017 and comprises five floating wind turbines with a total generating capacity of 30 MW. Ornithological monitoring is required as part of the Marine Licence for the wind farm and is carried out in conjunction with a large-scale seabird monitoring and research programme in north-western Europe (SEATRACK) involving the deployment of geolocation loggers to obtain seabird location estimates throughout the winter. Of particular concern are two species of auks (common guillemot Uria aalge and razorbill Alca torda) known to be highly vulnerable to displacement and barrier effects from offshore renewable developments. As part of the Hywind Scotland’s ornithological monitoring, data on year-round distribution and movements of guillemots and razorbills at three major colonies along the east coast of Scotland (East Caithness SPA, Buchan Ness to Collieston Coast SPA and Isle of May National Nature Reserve) were collected over two years (2017-18 and 2018-19). In 2017, a total of 190 geolocation loggers were deployed at the three study colonies. During the 2018 breeding season, a total of 82 loggers were retrieved and 193 new data loggers were deployed. During the 2019 breeding season a total of 102 loggers were retrieved, including several deployed in the first year. We obtained reasonable sample sizes in all cases (range 11-28) except razorbills at Buchan Ness to Collieston Coast, where only five loggers were retrieved each year. The geolocation data were processed using a probabilistic method to obtain two locations per day for each bird throughout the non-breeding period. The geolocation data were analysed to determine utilisation distributions for each species at each colony in 2017-18 and 2018-19. Overlap in distributions was quantified and minimum adequate sample size of tracked birds was examined. For both species, the distribution of birds from the three study colonies was similar at a broad spatial scale, with key wintering areas located around the colonies and in the central and southern parts of the North Sea. In guillemots, among-colony spatial similarity in kernel densities was generally high throughout the non-breeding period. In razorbills, spatial similarity among colonies was highest in the post-breeding period and lowest in late winter. Our results indicate that the three populations of guillemots and razorbills had a similar overall non-breeding distribution, with extensive use of the central and southern North Sea and areas around the breeding colonies, and this was broadly consistent between years. However, in both species there were important differences among colonies in the location of hotspots during the non-breeding period. The data provide important insights into the year-round space use of these two key species at three major colonies on the east coast of Scotland and their potential interaction with offshore renewable developments.
The project was funded by Equinor ASA and SEATRACK project (https://seapop.no/en/seatrack/, funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment, the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Norwegian Oil and Gas Association, and 8 oil companies). We are grateful to landowners for providing permission for us to undertake work and to NatureScot and British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) for issuing licences for the work. We thank Kenny Graham, Daniel Johnston, Rab Rae, Raymond Duncan, Moray Souter, Jenny Weston, Phil Bloor, Calum Campbell, Stuart Rae, Caitlin Tarvet, Robin Gray, Alexander Gilliland, Alastair Young, Sarah Fenn, Carrie Gunn, Sophie Bennett and Sarah Burthe for help on fieldwork. We are grateful to Steinar Eldoy, Ove Vold, Hannah Mary Goodlad, Reidun Erland and Monica Fundingsland of Equinor for support during project development and throughout the project.
seabird, geolocation, offshore wind developments, at-sea distribution
seabird, geolocation, offshore wind developments, at-sea distribution
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
