Downloads provided by UsageCounts
TiO2 is considered as one of the most efficient photocatalysts for the degradation of air and liquid indoor pollutants. However, pristine TiO2 can mainly absorb the UV fraction of solar light [1]. In addition, TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) were recently classified as a suspected carcinogen [2]. To address these challenges, Creative Nano is currently developing waterborne paints containing sulfur doped TiO2 NPs that are photocatalytically active under visible light irradiation [3]. Moreover, the S-doped TiO2 NPs were combined with silica to produce S-TiO2/SiO2 nanocomposites, following a “safe by design” approach, because the presence of a silica layer surrounding TiO2 NPs has been shown to restrict release of NPs into the environment [4]. In this work, a series of S-doped TiO2/SiO2 samples with different SiO2 content were prepared via sol-gel synthesis. The samples were characterized by InfraRed (IR) and Diffuse Reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) in the solid-state whereby their particle size was measured by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) in water. The samples were evaluated versus the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange (MO) in water under visible-light irradiation. Our results showed that the introduction of a SiO2 layer had a beneficial effect on photocatalytic activity compared to pristine S-TiO2. The highest MO degradation was observed for S-TiO2/SiO2 NPs with ~4 wt % SiO2. The best performing nanopowder was incorporated in a waterborne paint formulation. The photocatalytic properties of the paint were evaluated at lab-scale by monitoring MO degradation in solution . 45±3 % MO removal was observed after 5 h of visible light irradiation over five cycles.
{"references": ["[1] S. Banerjee et al. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2543\u20132554; https://doi.org/10.1021/jz501030x", "[2] Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 of 4 October 2019", "[3] T. Kalampaliki et al., Nanomaterials, 2021, 11, 2543; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11102543", "[4] R. Bengalli et al. Nanomaterials, 2019, 9, 1041; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9071041"]}
safe-by-design, TiO2 nanoparticles, photocatalytic degradation
safe-by-design, TiO2 nanoparticles, photocatalytic degradation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 16 | |
| downloads | 18 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts