Views provided by UsageCounts
Update: Patch 1.0.1 removes duplicates (up to 5% of the examples in the base version) and re-indexes the examples with new "id" values. The argument and conclusion are now merged into a single csv file for each split to be easily loaded as dataframes. We also include the test set used for manual evaluation (manual_evaluation_arguments.csv) to support qualitative comparisons. The corpus contains 130.519 (argumentative text, conclusion) pairs. There are four variations of this corpus: base: (argumentative text, conclusion) pairs topic: (topic encoded argumentative text, conclusion) pairs targets: (topic and target encoded argumentative text, conclusion) pairs aspects: (topic and aspect encoded argumentative text, conclusion) pairs Each variation is split into train, val, and test files. Additionally, the test set used for automatic evaluation is provided (automatic_evaluation_test_set.csv) which must be used for any quantitative evaluation.
argument summarization, text summarization, conclusion generation, computational argumentation
argument summarization, text summarization, conclusion generation, computational argumentation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 7 |

Views provided by UsageCounts