Downloads provided by UsageCounts
The Argument Aspect Corpus–Nuclear Energy (AAC-NE) contains English-language sentences with aspect annotations describing the content of arguments on the topic of nuclear energy. It was introduced in this paper: Jurkschat, L., Wiedemann, G., Heinrich, M., Ruckdeschel, M., & Torge, S. (2022). Few-Shot Learning for Argument Aspects of the Nuclear Energy Debate. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2022). European Language Resources Association (ELRA). The AAC-NE corpus is based on a subset of all argumentative sentences contained in the UKP SAM dataset [1] for which a majority vote of three annotators could be achieved during the annotation of the main argument aspect of each sentence. The CSV files contain one of nine aspect labels per argumentative sentence split into training, dev, and test set. aspect train dev test Sum Kripp. Alpha alternatives 100 16 21 137 0.69 costs 98 17 29 144 0.72 environment 209 27 64 300 0.74 innovation 33 2 8 43 0.38 reactor safety 112 17 43 172 0.59 reliability 47 5 10 62 0.36 waste 87 5 26 118 0.80 weapons 52 11 15 78 0.77 other 120 23 29 172 0.49 all 858 123 245 1226 0.62 pro 706 cons 520 Additionally, it contains 2000 unlabeled sentences with presumably argumentative content sampled from the newspaper “The Guardian”. [1] Stab, C., Miller, T., Schiller, B., Rai, P., & Gurevych, I. Cross-topic Argument Mining from Heterogeneous Sources. In E. Riloff, D. Chiang, J. Hockenmaier, & J. Tsujii (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 3664–3674). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1402
Argument Aspect, Argument Mining, Natural Language Processing
Argument Aspect, Argument Mining, Natural Language Processing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 105 | |
| downloads | 29 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts