Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2010
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Micropterigidae

Authors: Gibbs, George W.;

Micropterigidae

Abstract

Key to genera of SW Pacific Micropterigidae 1. Hindwing with R1 vein distinct in basal half (Fig. 4 B) or ‘recurrent’ (Fig. 4 D); antennal scape greatly swollen with distinct indentation on its mesal surface (Fig. 3 D); antennal ascoids radial, the sensory branches radiating from a circular base (Fig. 5 A) (‘sabatincoid’) ............................................................................................................................ 2 - Hindwing without a separate R1 vein (Fig. 4 C); antennal scape swollen and barrel-shaped, either without or with just the barest trace of an indentation (Fig. 3 B); antennal ascoids linear, the sensory branches arising out of a transverse groove around the circumference of the flagellomere (Fig. 5 C) (‘Australian-group’) ................................................ 4 2. Forewing R1 simple, unforked (Fig. 4 A); ventral part of male segment 9 sclerite shorter than sternite 6 (Fig. 8A) (north-eastern Australia) ............................................................................................ Austromartyria Gibbs, gen. nov. - Forewing R1 forked (Fig. 4 D); male segment 9 sclerite considerably longer than sternite 6 (New Zealand, New Caledonia) (= Sabatinca s.str. lineage)................................................................................................................................. 3 3. Labial palps 3-segmented; male tergum 10 bilobed; female bursa usually with signa. (New Caledonia, New Zealand) .................................................................................................................................................. Sabatinca Walker, 1863 - Labial palps 2-segmented; male tergum 10 a simple median lobe; female bursa lacking signa. (New Zealand only) .. ................................................................................ Palaeomicra Meyrick, 1885 (syn. Micropardalis Meyrick, 1912) 4. Forewings dark grey to black with strong purple iridescence, fasciae white (Figs. 1 A–H); hindwing with Sc+R1 forked (Fig. 4 C) .............................................................................................................................................................. - Forewings pale shining ochreous, fasciae black or brown (Figs 2 C–E); hindwing with Sc+R1 unforked .................. 6 5. Tegulae with tuft of long piliform scales; male phallus with terminal gonopore crescentic, both dorsal and ventral lips extended in mid-line to give a fish-mouthed shape (Figs. 10 C & D); female segment 9 largely membraneous, with a narrow ring sclerite, often almost non-existant dorsally (Fig. 10 F) (eastern Australia) ...................................... ............................................................................................................................................ Tasmantrix Gibbs, gen. nov. - Tegulae with flat lamellar scales; male phallus with dorsal gonopore, wide, heart-shaped (Fig. 13E); female segment 9 entirely membraneous, the position of ring sclerite marked by a circle of macrosetae (Fig. 13F) (North Island, New Zealand) .................................................................................................................... Zealandopterix Gibbs, gen. nov. 6. Ocelli absent; forewing with an oblique brown or black transverse fascia at mid- length, often interrupted in the middle (Figs. 2 D & E); male genitalia clearly visible externally, one third of abdomen length (north-eastern Australia, New Caledonia) ............................................................................................................... Aureopterix Gibbs, gen. nov. - Ocelli present; forewing without a transverse fascia at mid length (Fig.2 C); male genitalia not visible externally (New Caledonia) ............................................................................................................ Nannopterix Gibbs, gen. nov.

Published as part of Gibbs, George W., 2010, establishment of five new genera from Australia, New Caledonia and New Zealand, pp. 1-48 in Zootaxa 2520 on page 8, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.196244

Keywords

Lepidoptera, Insecta, Arthropoda, Animalia, Micropterigidae, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
Green