Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Apresentation is provided of a method – the Membership Table Method (MTM) – to determine the validity of categorical syllogisms. This method makes it possible for each syllogism to be assigned a specific set. If this set is equal to the universal set U, then the categorical syllogism considered is valid, and if that set is not equal to U, then that categorical syllogism is not valid. In other words, any categorical syllogism is valid if and only if its respective set, according to the MTM, is equal to the universal set U. The conclusion of a valid categorical syllogism whose premises are true is true.
membership tables, Logic and Foundations, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, truth tables, set theory, categorical syllogisms, propositional calculus, membership table method, Mathematics
membership tables, Logic and Foundations, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, truth tables, set theory, categorical syllogisms, propositional calculus, membership table method, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 39 | |
| downloads | 20 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts