Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Accepted manuscript - with corrected Figure 7. Different technologies for Floating Offshore Wind (FOW) systems have been developed and multiple studies exist that aim at comparing the techno-economic advantages and disadvantages of each technology. However, the assumptions and calculations used in these different studies vary largely resulting in high variation of the final cost estimates. This points to the need of developing a consistent method that allows for technology comparison at whole system but also subsystem level. In this paper, the sensitivity of the final results to the different assumptions and calculation setups is investigated. This study provides a discussion of the suitability of the applied methods, and as a result suggests the standardisation of the procedure, while defining a set of recommendations for good practices in techno-economic assessment of FOW technologies. The suggested common framework will facilitate the comparison of different FOW technologies based on costs and increase investor confidence.
For citation, please, refer to: Garcia-Teruel, A., & Jeffrey, H. (2020). The economics of floating offshore wind – A comparison of different methods. In Guedes Soares (Ed.), Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Renewable Energies Offshore (RENEW 2020) - Developments in Renewable Energies Offshore. Taylor & Francis Group, London.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 16 | |
| downloads | 23 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts