Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo...
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Sygma
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
IRIS Cnr
Conference object . 2021
Data sources: IRIS Cnr
CNR ExploRA
Conference object . 2021
Data sources: CNR ExploRA
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

Large scale testing of sticky traps for monitoring spittlebugs in different crops

Authors: Dongiovanni C; Di Carolo M, ; Fumarola G; N, Hassan; Usmani S; Tedone B; Ancona S; +1 Authors

Large scale testing of sticky traps for monitoring spittlebugs in different crops

Abstract

Monitoring spittlebugs has become crucial for the implementation of preventive measures against the spread of Xylella fastidiosa in Europe. So far, sweep nets have been commonly used to monitor spittlebugs in ground vegetation and canopies of trees or shrubs. From 2018 to 2020, we conducted several field experiments to test the effectiveness of sticky traps as tool for monitoring insect populations in different crops. We evaluated different coloured sticky traps (white, red, blue, yellow, yellow with circle-pattern and yellow with line-pattern) in comparison with sweep nets, and validated their efficiency on olive, almond, and cherry orchards. Results showed that: (i) yellow traps were the most attractive for Philaenus spumarius and Neophilaenus campestris; (ii) while in olive groves no differences were recorded for the yellow traps with different background, in the almond and cherry orchards, the capture of P. spumarius on those with black line-pattern were significantly higher than the other in some of the inspection periods; (iii) leafhoppers were the predominant non-target insects captured on the yellow sticky traps in our experimental fields. Comparison between yellow sticky traps and sweep nets for monitoring P. spumarius clearly showed that early in the season (April-May), i.e. when the adults emerge, insects were prevalently caught by sweeping net. Later on, the number of adults captured on traps were constantly higher than those captured by sweep nets, especially in olive groves with medium-high population densities and in almond and cherry orchards. In conditions with low population densities of P. spumarius, the two methods showed similar efficiency. Regarding N. campestris, no differences were observed between the two sampling methods on olive trees and cherry. While on almond yellow sticky traps were mostly effective than sweep net, prevalently in late summer when leaves fall and sweep net were difficult to use due to the stiffness of the branches. Our results suggest that the use of sweep nets soon after the emergence of the adults coupled with sticky traps for the rest of the adult season, can expedite monitoring programs finalized to the implementation of control measures (i.e. defining the threshold and the best time for insecticide applications).

IT; PDF; biagiotedone2@gmail.com

Country
Italy
Keywords

http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C20262, xylella, plant health, Neophilaenus campestris, http://id.agrisemantics.org/gacs/C1565, Philaenus spumarius, yellow sticky traps

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 3
  • 4
    views
    3
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
3
Green