Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
https://dx.doi.org/10.60692/jf...
Other literature type . 2021
Data sources: Datacite
https://dx.doi.org/10.60692/he...
Other literature type . 2021
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa) Cultivars for Their Agronomic Performances and Nutritive Values in Highland and Midland of Guji Zone of Oromia

تقييم مستنبتات البرسيم (ميديكاغو ساتيفا) لأدائها الزراعي وقيمها الغذائية في مرتفعات ووسط منطقة غوجي في أوروميا
Authors: Teshale Jabessa; Ketema Bekele; Zinash Amare;

Evaluation of Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa) Cultivars for Their Agronomic Performances and Nutritive Values in Highland and Midland of Guji Zone of Oromia

Abstract

L'étude a été menée dans le but d'identifier une biomasse élevée adaptable, un rapport feuille/vapeur et un rendement de bonne qualité des cultivars de luzerne au centre de recherche agricole de Bore. Huit cultivars de luzerne ; Hunter River, Magna-801-FG, Pioneer (1995) DZF-406, Segule1396 (408), DZF péruvien (406), F-G-9-09, F-L-L-77- (406) et Hunter River (4010) ont été testés en RCBD avec trois réplications. La hauteur de la plante était significativement (P 0,05) différents entre les traitements. En ce qui concerne les compositions chimiques du NDF, de l'ADL et du CP étaient significativement (P < 0,05) différentes entre les traitements. L'ADL supérieur a été obtenu à partir du cultivar Segule (1396)-408 (32,5 %) tandis que le faible rendement a été obtenu à partir du cultivar F-L-L-77 (406). Le NDF supérieur a été obtenu à partir du cultivar Poineer (1995) DZF-406 (70,7 %) alors que ; le faible était à partir du cultivar Péruvien-DZF-406 (45,9 %). Le rendement en CP a montré une différence significative (P < 0,05) parmi les cultivars. Le cultivar Magna-801-FG avait la CP supérieure (26,3%) tandis que le cultivar Segule (1396)-408 (11,3%) avait la teneur en CP inférieure. Le cultivar F-G-9-09 était produit supérieur en DM (91,8%) et inférieur en ADL (9,3%) tandis que le cultivar Segule 1396 (1396)-408 produit (91,3%)DM et inférieur en TASH (10,8%). L'OM supérieur a été obtenu à partir du cultivar Segule 1396 (408) (80,4%) par rapport aux autres. Basé sur son rendement, la hauteur de la plante, le rendement de la biomasse et les compositions chimiques, le bon DM et OM Péruvien-DZF-406, F-L-L-77 (406,) Segule-1396 (408) et F-G-9-09 est recommandé pour une promotion ultérieure dans les hautes et moyennes terres de Guji et les agroécologies similaires.

El estudio se realizó con el objetivo de identificar la alta biomasa adaptable, la relación hoja a vapor y el rendimiento de buena calidad de los cultivares de alfalfa en el centro de investigación agrícola Bore. Ocho cultivares de alfalfa; Hunter River, Magna-801-FG, Pioneer (1995) DZF-406, Segule1396 (408), DZF peruano (406), F-G-9-09, F-L-L-77- ( 406) y Hunter River (4010) se probaron en RCBD con tres replicaciones. La altura de la planta fue significativamente (P 0.05) entre los tratamientos. Con respecto a las composiciones químicas de NDF, ADL y CP fueron significativamente (P < 0.05) diferentes entre los tratamientos. La ADL superior se obtuvo de Segule (1396)-408 cultivar (32.5%) mientras que, bajo se obtuvo de F-L-L-77 (406) cultivar. El NDF superior se obtuvo de Poineer (1995) DZF-406 cultivar (70.7%) mientras que; el bajo fue de Peruvien-DZF-406 cultivar (45.9%). El rendimiento de CP mostró una diferencia significativa (P < 0.05) entre los cultivares. El cultivar Magna-801-FG tuvo el CP superior (26.3%) mientras que, el cultivar Segule (1396)-408 (11.3%) tuvo el contenido de CP inferior. El cultivar F-G-9-09 fue superior en DM (91.8%) y menor en ADL (9.3%) mientras que el cultivar Segule 1396 (1396)-408 produce (91.3%)DM y menor en TASH (10.8%). El OM superior se obtuvo del cultivar Segule 1396 (408) (80.4%) en comparación con otros. En función de su rendimiento, altura de la planta, rendimiento de biomasa y composiciones químicas, se recomienda un buen DM y OM Peruvien-DZF-406, F-L-L-77 (406,) Segule-1396 (408) y F-G-9-09 para una mayor promoción en las tierras altas y medias de Guji y agroecologías similares.

The study was conducted with the objective to identify adaptable high biomass, leaf to steam ratio and good quality yield of Alfalfa cultivars at Bore Agricultural research center.Eight Alfalfa cultivars; Hunter river, Magna-801-FG, Pioneer (1995) DZF-406, Segule1396 (408), Peruvian DZF (406), F-G-9-09, F-L-L-77-( 406) and Hunter river (4010) were tested in RCBD with three replications.Plant height was significantly (P 0.05) different among treatments.Regarding chemical compositions of NDF, ADL and CP were significantly (P < 0.05) different among treatments.The superior ADL was obtained from Segule (1396)-408 cultivar (32.5%) while, low was obtained from F-L-L-77 (406) cultivar.The superior NDF was obtained from Poineer (1995) DZF-406 cultivar (70.7%) whereas; the low was from Peruvien-DZF-406 cultivar (45.9%).The CP yield showed significant (P < 0.05) difference among cultivars.Magna-801-FG cultivar had the superior (26.3%)CP while, Segule (1396)-408 cultivar (11.3%) had the inferior CP content.Cultivar F-G-9-09 was produce superior in DM (91.8%) and less in ADL (9.3%) while Segule 1396 (1396)-408 cultivar produce (91.3%)DM and lower in TASH (10.8%).superior OM was obtained from Segule 1396 (408) cultivar (80.4%) compared to others.Based on its yield, plant height, biomass yield and chemical compositions, good DM and OM Peruvien-DZF-406, F-L-L-77 (406,) Segule-1396 (408) and F-G-9-09 is recommended for further promotion in the highland and midland of Guji and similar agro-ecologies.

أجريت الدراسة بهدف تحديد الكتلة الحيوية العالية القابلة للتكيف ونسبة الورقة إلى البخار والمحصول الجيد لأصناف البرسيم في مركز الأبحاث الزراعية في بور. تم اختبار ثمانية أصناف من البرسيم ؛ هنتر ريفر، ماجنا-801 - FG، بايونير (1995) DZF -406، Segule1396 (408)، بيروفي DZF (406)، F - G -9-09، F - L - L -77 - ( 406) ونهر هنتر (4010) في RCBD مع ثلاث نسخ متماثلة. كان ارتفاع النبات أعلى بشكل ملحوظ (P 0.05) مختلفة بين العلاجات. فيما يتعلق بالتركيبات الكيميائية لـ NDF و ADL و CP كانت مختلفة بشكل كبير (P < 0.05) بين العلاجات. تم الحصول على ADL متفوقة من Segule (1396) - 408 صنف (32.5 ٪) بينما تم الحصول على منخفضة من F - L -77 (406) صنف. تم الحصول على NDF متفوقة من صنف Poineer (1995) DZF -406 (70.7 ٪) في حين ؛ كان الانخفاض من صنف Peruvien - DZF -406 (45.9 ٪). أظهر عائد CP فرقًا كبيرًا (P < 0.05) بين الأصناف. كان صنف ماجنا-801 -فغ متفوقة (26.3 ٪)كب في حين أن سيجول (1396)-408 الصنف (11.3 ٪) كان أدنى محتوى كب. كان كولتيفار F - G -9-09 إنتاج متفوقة في دم (91.8 ٪) وأقل في أدل (9.3 ٪) في حين سيجول 1396 (1396)-408 إنتاج الصنف (91.3 ٪)دم وأقل في تاش (10.8 ٪). تم الحصول على أوم متفوقة من سيجول 1396 (408) الصنف (80.4 ٪) مقارنة مع الآخرين .استنادا إلى غلة، وارتفاع النبات، وإنتاج الكتلة الحيوية والتركيبات الكيميائية، دم جيدة و أوم بيرو- دزف-406، F - L - L -77 (406،) سيجول-1396 (408) و F - G -9 -09 ينصح لمزيد من الترويج في المرتفعات ومنتصف غوجي والأيكولوجيات الزراعية المماثلة.

Keywords

Soil Science, Life Sciences, Plant Science, Yield (engineering), Horticulture, Agronomy, Materials science, Cultivar Evaluation, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Biofortification of Staple Crops for Human Nutrition, Cultivar Evaluation and Mega-Environment Investigation, Management of Soil Fertility and Crop Productivity, Metallurgy, Cultivar, Biology, Medicago sativa

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 7
  • 3
    views
    7
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
7
Green